Thursday, 23 October 2025

Kerala and PM SRI: Politics or Progress?

 

Kerala and PM SRI: Politics or Progress?

— V. R. Ajith Kumar

Kerala has long been known for thinking differently when it comes to education. The state has often deviated from traditional educational models followed elsewhere in India—an approach that has brought both advantages and disadvantages to generations of students. Interestingly, the Central Government’s National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has incorporated many of the models that Kerala pioneered years ago.

However, due to political opposition, Kerala chose not to sign the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Union Government for implementing certain schemes under the NEP. As a result, the state lost substantial financial assistance, and more importantly, its students were deprived of a broader national educational vision. Many who care deeply about the future of education in Kerala now view this ideological tussle between the Centre and the state with concern.

In India’s federal system, development ideally moves forward in a “double-engine” manner—when both the Central and State Governments pull in the same direction, progress accelerates and efficiency improves. Unfortunately, in Kerala’s case, the engines seem to be moving in opposite directions. The Centre and the state are politically at odds, and this conflict often hampers effective governance.

It is essential to separate politics from governance. Availing the maximum benefits of Central schemes should not be seen as a political concession but as a practical step toward public welfare. It is immature to believe that cooperating with the Centre automatically strengthens the BJP or weakens the Left.

Kerala has undertaken extensive school renovations through KIIFB (Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board) funding—funds that must eventually be repaid with interest. But what would be the harm in implementing centrally sponsored schemes like PM SRI, where 60% of the cost is borne by the Central Government? The financial benefit alone should make the state reconsider its stance.


What is PM SRI?

PM SRI stands for Prime Minister’s Schools for Rising India. The scheme aims to transform select existing schools into model institutions aligned with the spirit and philosophy of the National Education Policy 2020. It includes Kendriya Vidyalayas, Navodaya Vidyalayas, and other government schools, with the goal of raising educational standards and inspiring nearby schools to improve as well.

The PM SRI initiative promotes holistic education and shifts the focus from rote learning to competency-based learning. It emphasizes smart classrooms, digital learning tools, e-content, infrastructure upgrades, vocational training, IT and AI skills, as well as opportunities for internships and entrepreneurship.

The scheme also stresses collaboration with local industries, practical learning, and conceptual understanding. Furthermore, PM SRI schools are envisioned as green schools—implementing projects such as solar energy, LED lighting, nutritional gardens, waste management, plastic-free zones, water conservation, and rainwater harvesting.


Implementation and Scope

The project runs for five years (2022–23 to 2026–27). Schools are identified through a transparent selection process using UDISE (Unified District Information System for Education) data. Each state must sign an MoU with the Centre to ensure full compliance with the NEP.

A school will earn the PM SRI status only after a competitive evaluation and a field inspection. The School Quality Assessment Framework (SQAF) will be used to continuously monitor progress.

The total project cost is ₹27,360 crore, of which the Centre contributes ₹18,128 crore and the states ₹9,232 crore. Each block can have a maximum of two PM SRI schools, and it is mandatory to use the regional language as the medium of instruction at least up to Class V. Across India, 14,500 schools and about 18 lakh students are expected to benefit from the programme.


Kerala’s Missed Opportunity

Kerala’s decision to stay out of the PM SRI scheme was, in my opinion, a serious mistake. The initiative could have further enhanced the pioneering work done through IT@School and KITE, and elevated Kerala’s already commendable education system to new heights.

If recent reports are true—that the Centre has agreed to include Kerala in the scheme even at this late stage—it would be wise for the Chief Minister and the Education Minister to seize the opportunity. They should rise above political resistance, including that from the CPI, and make a decision in the best interests of Kerala’s students and the future of education in the state.


No comments:

Post a Comment